This thread is for comments that are not in keeping with my post of yesterday
Grandad walloped again by TB at PMQâ€™s yesterday,also TB managed to highlight the garbage thatâ€™s put out in Lib Dem literature at election time.
The â€˜all things to all peopleâ€™ stuff is wearing pretty thin and great that its being more & more exposed,on the other hand everyone knows the Lib Dems have a snowballâ€™s chance in hell of ever forming a government so I guess it provides some form of entertainment.
At least to look half serious surely they can find a replacement for Grandad at PMQâ€™s ?
by mark (lover of extreme sports) June 22nd, 2006 at 3:00 pm
Roger, now please tell me what my â€œpetty prejudicesâ€ are suuposed to be or provide an apology.
Time and time again you have been abusive, but I will never sink to that level.
by Printz June 22nd, 2006 at 3:16 pm
Mr Palmer, I just donâ€™t get it when you think its good that your colleagues can use publicly funded airtime, and money possibly obtained from selling peerages, to fund a campaign that calls an opponent a reptile and then you complain when somebody provides what probably millions would agree is an accurate description of Mandelson.
Do you EVER ask yourself WHY those on the right like SeanT and those on the left like myself are very angry and why tens of thousands of members are deserting the Labour party?
Letâ€™s not forget that New Labour has a record of discrediting those that oppose them, from rail campaigners, to an elderly lady on a hospital trolly, to Black Rod and Mo Mowlem to Doctor Wakefield to whistleblowers to a young man who held Hodge responsible for his child abuse, to Dr Kelly. It is New Labour strategy to smear, discredit and mock those that oppose.
So please explain why you should be outraged at what SeanT has stated?
by Printz June 22nd, 2006 at 3:05 pm